silent film

Two Arabian Knights (1927) | Jamie Daily

Two Arabian Knights (1927)
1st Academy Awards 1929
Nominated for 1 award.
Nominated for Directing-Comedy Picture (Lewis Milestone).
Not yet released.


As far as I could find concerning Two Arabian Knights, it has not yet been released on DVD.  If you know any different or are aware of where I could find the film except for in the possession of Turner Classic Movies, I would greatly appreciate the information.  Apparently the film was assumed lost until the death of Howard Hughes in 2004 when a print was restored at the University of Nevada.  Here is an original review from when the film was released in 1927 by Mordaunt Hall of the New York Times:


“Two Arabian Knights,” the current picture at the Paramount Theatre, is a genuinely clever comedy in which the principals scorn the usual fractious tactics and rely on intelligent acting. The two actors who supply the fun in this bright piece of work are William Boyd, the hero of DeMille’s “Volga Boatman,” and Louis Wolheim, a stage and screen nortrayer of choice villainy who figured as Captain Flagg in the play, “What Price Glory.”

This production has been expertly handled by Lewis Milestone, who has performed his task with a degree of sanity that is most welcome. Who knows but what this photoplay may serve to discourage silly and boisterous efforts and encourage this same restrained type of comedy? This film is filled with splendid photographic effects that have evidently been made at no small cost. Where a number of men are needed to add to the impression of a sequence, Mr. Milestone has not stinted himself, for he shows an imposing array of “extras,” all suitably costumed.

It is only toward the end of this subject that the adventures assume a fantastic aspect. There are then scenes wherein the two heroes scale walls and invade a Bey’s palace somewhere in Turkey. In view of what has preceded this, one is, however, willing to pardon such actions, for they are not without true humor and moreover none of the incidents are dependent upon the subtitles for the fun they create.

“Two Arabian Knights” succeeds where “Tin Hats” failed. It is a yarn dealing with two American soldiers who are taken prisoner. Mr. Milestone starts his ball of fun rolling in an initial scene where Private W. Daingerfield Phelps (Mr. Boyd) and Sergeant Peter McGaffney are discovered in the slough of a shell hole. When Phelps observes that his companion is his hated top sergeant he wants to have it out with McGaffney before a shell comes along and cuts off their existence. Eventually the deep hole in the muddy earth is surrounded by Germans, and Phelps and McGaffney are captured.

There are some realistic scenes of the German prison camp in snow-covered Northern Germany, and others that are concerned with the escape of the two men, who, while they still have no particular liking for each other, don’t want to be alone. It is set forth, that their Khaki uniforms in the snow stick out like a sore thumb, and finally, after an encounter between two Turks, the Americans help themselves to the white cloaks of their victims. Subsequently the two adventurers find themselves on a train bound for Constaninople, and after reaching that city they are sent aboard a ship, on which they meet the heroine, Mirza.

A little thing like having no ready cash is settled by Phelps’s diving into the purser’s cabin and binding and gagging that officer. There is dismay on McGaffney’s countenance when Phelps reappears with a fistfull of paper money.

Through purely natural expressions on the faces of the sturdy pair the Paramount audience yesterday afternoon was thrown into a high state of glee. And by the skillful and gradual way in which Mr. Milestone unfurls his episodes, there is a distinct element of suspense.

Mr. Wolheim is capital in his portrayal of alarm, annoyance, anger, satisfaction and relief. Mr. Boyd also contributes in no small way to the gaiety of this piece. In fact although it is a comedy Mr. Boyd’s acting in this screen effort is even better than his serious work in other productions. Mary Astor is seen as Mirza and she, too, is deserving of her share of credit, and so is Ian Keith, who figures as a Turkish officer with a sly sense of humor.
TWO ARABIAN KNIGHTS, with Louis Wolheim, William Boyd, Mary Astor, Michael Vavitch, Ian Keith, DeWitt Jannings, Michael Visaroff and Boris Karloff, written by Donald McGibney, directed by Lewis Milestone; “The Barber of Seville,” with stage effects by Paul Oscard; “Moonlight,” a Bruce sconic; “Florida,” staged by Jack Partington. At the Paramount Theatre.


Sources: NY Timesultishare

The Magic Flame (1927) | Jamie Daily

The Magic Flame (1927)
1st Academy Awards 1929
Nominated for 1 award.
Nominated for Cinematography (George Barnes).
Lost film.


Only five out of the original eleven reels of The Magic Flame remain, and it is hard to tell precisely where they might be.  It is rumored that they are at the International Museum of Photography and Film at George Eastman House.  Here follows an original review by Mordaunt Hall, published September 19, 1927, in the New York Times:


An ingeniously contrived and magnificently photographed production, with the contrasting backgrounds of life under a circus tent and that in the palace of a mythical kingdom, has been wrought by Henry King out of Rudolph Lother’s novel, “King Harlequin,” which for reasons best known to Samuel Goldwyn, the producer, comes to the Rialto Theatre screen as “The Magic Flame.” In this film it falls to Ronald Colman‘s lot to impersonate both a sympathetic clown and a rascally prince, while Vilma Banky, the lovely Hungarian actress, plays the part of a stellar trapeze performer with the wagon show; she is adored by the humble follower of Grimaldi and she also attracts the vagrant eye of the heir to Illyria’s throne.

Mr. King has pictured the various incidents of this story in an imaginative fashion and his introduction of the Clown, Tito, is excellent. At first the features of Roland Colman are hidden under putty and greasepaint, but this Clown sits at a mirror and gradually wipes off the disguise until the well-known physiognomy of the popular player is revealed.

It is, of course, a highly romantic affair, but the scenes in the circus are brilliantly filmed. After an exciting happening, Mr. King turns his camera to the unperturbed countenance of the circus band leader. This director has also accomplished remarkable effects by soft shadows and the close-ups of both Mr. Colman and Miss Banky fit in nicely with the action of the narrative.

The comedy in the circus scenes is very well done, for although some of the tricks are ancient they belong to this type of show. There is the strong man who awes the audience with his lifting of prodigious weights and then there is the clown and his absurdities.

Tito and the prince resemble each other like the proverbial two peas. The Prince’s father dies, and after the heir apparent, like Humpty Dumpty, is beyond picking up by all the king’s horses and all the king’s men, Tito finds himself bound to accompany Illyria’s noblemen to the royal palace or be arrested for the murder of the Prince. The beautiful trapeze artist suspects foul play and as she hears that the Prince is safe she believes that Tito has been slain. Therefore with a pistol concealed in a bouquet of flowers, she goes forth to put a bullet through the new King.

Throughout this good-natured and interesting romance there are some joyous situations. At first one is impelled to regret Mr. King’s permitting the trapeze artist to leap out of a window, but when she happily saves herself by clinging to a tree one realizes that it is her circus stunts that serve her in good stead.

The way in which Tito gets away from the palace is artfully arranged, for the Chancellor, who might have killed Tito (as the King), discovers that it is unnecessary. When the Chancellor informs the clown that he (Tito) must be apprehended for the slaying of the King Tito cooly tells that official that he will have a hard time proving that he (Tito) is not the King.

Mr. Colman fills the dual rôle with much artistry. His mustache is longer and neatly curled as the Prince. This Prince also wears a monocle. The clown has put a faint suggestion of a mustache and his face does not appear to be as well nourished as that of the Prince.

Miss Banky is attractive enough as the circus performer, but after the Chancellor has bought her one of Illyria’s latest creations, she is stunning. Miss Banky also delivers a competent performance. Gustav von Seyffertitz is splendid as the Chancellor.
THE MAGIC FLAME, with Ronald Colman, Vilma Banky, Augustino Borgato, Gustav von Seyffertitz, Harvey Clarke, Shirley Palmer, George Davis, Andre Cheron and Vadim Uraneff, adapted from Rudolph Lothar‘s novel, “King Harlequin,” directed by Henry King; “Memories,” a technicolor novelty; Miriam Lax, soprano. At the Rlalto Theatre.


Sources: NY TimesIMDBA Certain Cinema


Tempest (1928) Review | Jamie Daily

Tempest (1928)
1st Academy Awards 1929
1/5 Stars
Nominated for 1 award, which it won.
Won Art Direction (William C. Menzies).
Watched October 17, 2012.


The sun is setting on silent films, but is also setting on John Barrymore’s illustrious acting career.  In a performance that is reportedly more mellow and controlled than his norm, which is something that flies well in today’s audiences, he once again plays in a romantic film.  He is a sergeant in the Russian army and is studying to become an officer, something that has not happened in years.  To a society that had World War I fresh in its memory, a film about Russia and the fall of its aristocrats was common, although in Tempest, it is easier to feel sympathy toward the Czar.


Sergeant Ivan Markov, although he is socially a peasant, has somehow gained the favor of the General (George Fawcett) and is therefore granted a review.  Despite the Captain (Ullrich Haupt) being very anti-Markov, Markov is impressively promoted to Lieutenant and, in an incredible display of affection, the General gives Markov his old epaulettes.  In a recurring role, a greasy, wide-eyed peddler (Boris de Fast) discourages Markov constantly throughout the film, telling him that Russia will soon belong to the people and that the aristocrats will never truly accept him.


Here we introduce Princess Tamara (Camilla Horn), daughter of the General, and an extremely proud woman.  Our first glance of her is during Markov’s review, when she asks her father if a man could be more perfect.  This implies that she is a fun-loving, kind woman, but this opinion is quickly corrected.  Prior to Markov’s official promotions, his fellow Sergeant Bulba (Louis Wolheim) steals the clothing of two bathing women from another soldier and upon intending to “return” them, Markov reprimands him and takes the clothes back himself.  Inevitably, it is Tamara bathing and her fury is very evident.  Markov, however, is a little dense and suddenly thinking himself in love, he kisses the princess.  This leads to his persistent (and incredibly creepy) chasing of the princess, even at her birthday party.  After being rejected, Markov drinks too much, and in search of the wash room, finds himself in Tamara’s bedroom, where he falls asleep on her bed next to the flowers he intends to give her.  When the princess finds him, she rings for help, and the General arrests him in a fury.

Markov is stripped of rank and sentenced to five years hard labor, which is quickly increased to solitary confinement.  The princess suddenly feels remorse and affection.  When the aristocracy finally falls, the peddler is revealed as a heartless leader.  He breaks Markov from prison with Bulba at his right, gives him a fur coat, and lets him sit at his left while dolling out death sentences to anyone who supported the Czar, literally ripping children from the arms of their mothers and throwing them in front of a firing squad.


Many movie critics often talk about the suspension of reality, which I generally find very annoying because unless it is a documentary, it is always just a representation of an idea and therefore is not reality.  However, when it comes to Tempest, I will wholeheartedly say that in order to enjoy this film or think it remotely romantic, you will probably have to accept that it would never happen in real life.  Markov was very creepy in his initial affections and I don’t blame the princess for not encouraging him whatsoever–too much positive reinforcement and you create a stalker.  She doesn’t show him any kindness until the end of the film and therefore it is a wonder Markov can think his affections are love.


The artistic qualities of the film are hard to see, due to damaged film, and the end of the film is very fragmented because it is so severely irreparable.  There are a lot of scratches, bubbles, and dirt that cloud up the picture, but if you can look beyond it to the elaborate sets, you might be able to see why Tempest won the award for Art Direction.  William Menzies was in competition with such films as Sunrise, therefore his achievements must have been well appreciated at the time to conquer such a running mate.


All things considered, I would not recommend Tempest.  I found it intriguing how I rooted for the Czar and the aristocrats so much, but it is possible because none of their characters were creepy, but instead genuine and believable.  Beyond that and the sets, there is little to recommend the film.


Sources: The Silent Movie BlogClassic Film UnionIMDBClassic Film GuideSlant MagazineSean Axmaker

Sadie Thompson (1928) Review | Jamie Daily

Sadie Thompson (1928)
1st Academy Awards 1929
2/5 Stars
Nominated for 2 awards.
Nominated for Best Actress (Gloria Swanson) and Cinematography (George Barnes).
Watched October 4, 2012.


I have mentioned films not standing the test of time several times on this blog, and expect to mention it several times over, but I believe this is the first time I will say it in reference to a silent film.  Although Sadie Thompson does indeed deserve both of its nominations, the story is reminiscent of something you know is a nightmare but are unable to wake up from it.


It starts well, with an island and a group of marines who have not seen white men, or more importantly white women in months.  In comes a ship, carrying a reformer (Lionel Barrymore) and his wife, a tourist couple, and a single woman (Gloria Swanson) who is a breathtaking beauty and a flirt right from the beginning.  All of the serving men are taken, especially the bashful Sergeant O’Hara (Raoul Walsh).  Unfortunately, it turns out that Sadie’s “connecting” ship is quarantined for small pox and she has to stay on the island, much to the chagrin of the reformer, Mr. Davidson, and his wife.  Immediately he assumes that she is a whore because she comes from San Francisco.


Using his incredible influence over the governor, he won’t allow her to proceed onto her final destination, but forces her back to San Francisco.  Terrified and angry, she uses all of her whiles, every trick in the book, but Mr. Davidson will not budge.  He believes that in order for her to repent, she must return home.


Although Swanson occasionally falls into the trap of overacting, she does very well at communicating through only body language.  You can tell that she is a free spirited, energetic woman that cannot be tied down, and her chemistry with Walsh, who is also the director, is wonderful.  The cinematography is remarkably better that the other silent films I have reviewed so far, without counting Sunrise.


The storyline, as well as Barrymore, are the two aspects of the film that were unbearable.  It is supposedly a testament to hypocrisy, but really all I saw was a power hungry, crazed man whose actions and religion were both portrayed very negatively.  Any Oscar-nominated film seems as if it should be making a statement, but I just felt hate toward the man and saw little connection with the alluded hypocrisy.  Barrymore did fairly well with what was given to him, and he really is a terrifying villain, but his end does not seem fitting.


Toward the climactic finale, Sadie falls under Mr. Davidson’s spell, but eight minutes before the end, all that we see are still images stitched together to replace the corroded film.  As saddening as this always is, it was a bit of a relief for me not to see the final scenes, although I know I lost of lot of analysis and understanding because of it.  It almost feels like they created an ending because theoretically there has to be an ending to the story, but in reality the result seems disjointed from the rest of the story.  However, my belief that it is disjointed doesn’t hold much water because I haven’t actually seen the final minutes of the film.  I will give Walsh the benefit of the doubt and say that the actual ending of the film was probably much better and conclusive.


As far as films go, this isn’t one that I would eagerly recommend.  If you are looking for a more energetic and engaging silent film than the romances I have reviewed so far, this could be an option for you.  My favourite part was the very endearing character that Walsh himself played.


Sources: Doctor MacroBarewallsIMDBRotten TomatoesSilents are Golden

A Morning Stroll (2011) Review | Jamie Daily

A Morning Stroll (2011)
84th Academy Awards 2012
3/5 Stars
Nominated for Short Animated Film (Grant Orchard, Sue Goffe)
Watched September 19, 2012.


There is so much to say about this short, and yet I will say very little because so much would be given away!  That’s the trouble with shorts–7 minutes of film doesn’t give a lot of room for mystery in your review.


It is the story of a chicken, but is told from three different eras in three different animation styles.  The animation isn’t the best, especially when set next to something done by Pixar, but I enjoyed the change.  It begins in 1959 with black and white silent film style, accompanied by simple stick-figure-like animated characters that are fairly time appropriate.


Next is a longer sequence, perhaps emphasizing a move from the simple into the distracted and chaotic 2009.  Here we are introduced to carelessness, pointless video games, cell phone distraction, and lack of respect.


The last time we visit is 2059.  If you are wondering how the world will look forty-seven years from now, you will have to see this short, as I’m not going to mention anything except that it holds the best animation of the short.  However, it still falls a little flat and I am left in more appreciation of the classic simplicity of the 1959 animation.


There are a lot of laughs and somewhat unexpected turns, complete with a cute, cheesy ending that makes the entire film worth it.  It you can locate this one I definitely suggest you watch it.  I think that any generation will be able to watch it, appreciate it, and connect with it in completely different ways from one another.



Sources: DC Shorts Film Festival411 ManiaLights Camera JacksonOpinionlessPaste Magazine